Leica Summicron 35mm f/2 (V1) Lens Review

Today, we’re diving into the nuances of the Leica Summicron 35mm f/2, Version 1. I have a love-hate relationship with this lens, as it brings both excitement and frustration. In this review, I’ll cover both the rigid and collapsible versions of the lens, sharing sample photos and giving you everything you need to know. Let’s explore the pros, cons, and the unique quirks that come with each lens.

Why the Summicron 35mm f/2 Replica?

Earlier this year, I picked up the Light Lens Lab 35mm f/2, and took it on an adventure across Europe and beyond—Poland, the Czech Republic, even Vegas! This lens has been a staple for my Leica workshops in London, and let me tell you, it’s a love-hate relationship.

In addition to the collapsible version I own, there’s also a rigid version. I held off on this article for a while because I was tempted to buy the rigid lens myself and do a comparison, but a chance encounter with Faisal (My Friend), who happened to own the rigid version, finally gave me the opportunity to test them side by side.

The Basics: Rigid vs. Collapsible

Both lenses are available in Leica screw mounts, which can be adapted to fit Leica M cameras using an adapter. The rigid version is more straightforward—solid, classic, and functional. The collapsible version, as the name suggests, can be retracted, which makes it compact and ideal for travel.

One question I often get is whether it’s safe to collapse these lenses on different Leica or Voigtländer cameras. The answer is yes—you can safely collapse the collapsible version on various Leica M and L cameras without any issues.

Key Specifications and Features

The Light Lens Lab replicas of the Summicron 35mm f/2 are designed to be as close as possible to the original Leica version 1 Summicron. That means they feature eight elements in six groups, with the rigid version weighing in at 206 grams and the collapsible version at just 135 grams.

• Filter Size: Both lenses have a 39mm filter size, matching the Leica Summicron lenses of old.
• Focus Distance: The collapsible version can focus down to 0.5 meters, while the rigid version stops at 0.7 meters.
• Build Quality: Both versions feel robust, but the rigid version is slightly heavier and bulkier—more so than the collapsible one.

Pros of the Collapsible Version

1. Compact Size: Once collapsed, this lens is incredibly small. Perfect for street photographers or travelers.
2. Lightweight: At just 135 grams, it’s much lighter than the rigid version, making it easy to carry around.
3. Close Focus: With a minimum focus distance of 0.5 meters, it’s more versatile, especially if you’re using it on a mirrorless camera.

However, with these pros come a few significant downsides. Let’s dive into those next.

Cons of the Collapsible Version

1. No Aperture Marking: Unlike traditional lenses, the collapsible version lacks an aperture scale. This can be frustrating if you’re used to being able to quickly glance at the lens for settings.
2. Rotating Barrel: Adjusting the aperture on this lens can be annoying because the entire barrel rotates, but the aperture doesn’t change.
3. No Filter Thread: While you can now get a lens hood that supports 43mm filters, the lens itself doesn’t have a native filter thread.
4. Potential for Blurry Photos: Because it’s collapsible, there’s a risk of not fully extending it, which can lead to out-of-focus images.

Pros of the Rigid Version

Now, onto the rigid version! The rigid 35mm feels like a classic Leica lens through and through. It’s solid, and it’s got that lovely weight and feel to it.

1. Modern Focus Tab: Unlike the collapsible version, this one comes with a modern focus tab that’s quick and easy to use.
2. Easy Aperture and Focus Scale: The aperture and focus scales are visible from the top, making zone focusing and aperture adjustment a breeze.
3. Stable Build: Without the need to collapse, this version is ready to shoot anytime without the worry of misalignments.

Cons of the Rigid Version

1. Larger Size and Weight: While not huge, the rigid version is a bit heavier and bulkier than the collapsible version.
2. Infinity Lock: The rigid lens has an infinity lock, which some might find cumbersome, especially when shooting quickly on the streets.
3. Semi-Transparent Dot: It has a pink semi-transparent dot instead of the classic red or white dot you might be used to. Not a dealbreaker, but it’s a bit unusual.

Sample Photos and Image Quality

Let’s talk about image quality. Both lenses are optically identical, so the main differences lie in handling and build. The colors are beautiful, and you get that classic Leica rendering with both versions. I’ve taken both lenses out on the streets of London, capturing everything from street portraits to architecture.

Shooting towards the light, you’ll notice a bit of flare, which can actually add some character to your photos. The collapsible lens with the UV filter gives off more pronounced flares, which can either enhance your shots or be a distraction, depending on your style.

Final Thoughts: Which Lens is Right for You?

The rigid version offers a classic Leica experience with all the bells and whistles of a sturdy, no-fuss lens. If you’re a street photographer who prioritizes portability, the collapsible version is fantastic, but it does have its quirks.

Light Lens Lab has done an incredible job replicating the classic Leica look with these lenses. If you’re leaning toward one of these, think about what’s more important to you: portability and size, or convenience and ease of use.

Hopefully, this gives you a better idea of what to expect from these lenses. Thanks for sticking around, and if you’re interested in more reviews and photography tips, be sure to bookmark our site HavenlyHub. Catch you in the next one!